Add fan-in summary job to Python tests workflow for branch protection#14810
Open
rtibbles wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Add fan-in summary job to Python tests workflow for branch protection#14810rtibbles wants to merge 1 commit into
rtibbles wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
github-actions
Bot
added
DEV: dev-ops
Contributor
Build Artifacts
Smoke test screenshot |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Since #14457 the path-match skip is at job level, so skipped matrix jobs report one bare-named check run instead of per-version ones, leaving the matrix-suffixed required checks stuck on "Expected". This adds a single stable "Python tests" fan-in check for branch protection to require instead.
References
Regression introduced in #14457.
Reviewer guidance
This PR touches Python test paths, so the new "Python tests" check should report success on a full run here. After merge, branch protection needs updating to require "Python tests" and drop the per-version checks.
AI usage
Diagnosed and written with Claude Code — it compared check run reporting on skipped vs running PRs to confirm the missing matrix expansion, and drafted the workflow change, which I reviewed.